Internationality of psychology versus “national psychologies”

Kornilova, T.V.

Автор: Kornilova T.V.
Журнал: Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal
Том: 36
Номер: 3
Год издания: 2015
Издательство: Izdatel'stva Nauka
Местоположение издательства: Russian Federation
Первая страница: 91
Последняя страница: 99
Аннотация: Grounds for understanding psychological science as an integrated formation in the development of which multiple processes of socio-cultural determination are included are discussed in the article. History of psychology enables to demonstrate the specific character of psychology formation within the limits of different countries and cultural regions as well as heterochrony of similar processes of socio-economic development of psychological science in them. “Mainstreams” demonstrate the processes of globalization in science. Not a vogue but essential changes in methodology and theory of psychology can be revealed behind them. General standards of experimenting defi ned by K. Popper laid down the foundations for researching by means of this scientifi c method for all diversity of theoretical approaches and fi elds in psychology. Psychologist reconstructs unobservable processes using any scientifi c method. Indirect way of knowing related to hypothetic- deductive reasoning sets general “mainstream” of scientifi c psychology. The world of theories is international as well, so far as it gives general above-individual psychological knowledge; the object of study includes specifi c approaches for psychological reality under study separation and psychological research’s organization which however could not be regarded as variants of national psychologies.
Добавил в систему: Корнилова Татьяна Васильевна

	ИСТИНА	Войти в систему Регистрация
	ИСТИНА ИНХС РАН
	Главная Поиск Статистика О проекте Помощь

ИСТИНА

ИСТИНА ИНХС РАН

Internationality of psychology versus “national psychologies”статья Исследовательская статья

Прикрепленные файлы