Историография XIX-XX  вв. об истории крымских землетрясений античного и средневекового периодов

Хапаев, В.В.

Автор: Хапаев В.В.
Журнал: Ученые записки Таврического национального университета им. В.И.Вернадского. Научный журнал. Серия "Исторические науки"
Том: 25
Номер: 1
Год издания: 2012
Первая страница: 185
Последняя страница: 198
Аннотация: Анализируется историография сейсмической истории Крыма античного и средневекового периодов. Сделан вывод, что научный интерес к крымским землетрясениям древности и средневековья усиливался лишь после разрушительных сейсмических событий на полуострове. Представление о разрушительном воздействии на Крым землетрясений, происходящих в районе Мраморного моря, является ошибочным, а опирающиеся на данную гипотезу исторические реконструкции неверны. The historiography of Crimean seismic history of the antique and medieval periods, created in second half XIX – 70th years of the XX centuries is analyzed in this article. Process of origin and transformation into a historiographic myth of a hypothesis about destructive influence to Crimea of earthquakes with epicenters around Sea of Marmara is studied. The author cites the data of natural-science researches proving an inaccuracy of this thesis. Special attention is given to the analysis of Crimean earthquakes historiography created in 20-40th years of the XX-th century «under impression» from destructive seismic event on September, 11th, 1927. Monography "Antisejsmizm of ancient architecture" by A. S. Bashkirov, created in 30-40th years of the XX century, was highly appreciated by the author for it contains a large analytical material about the antiseismic receptions applied in ancient cities, including the Crimean ones. Unfortunately, this research remains not noticed by the Soviet scientists. The author emphasizes catalogue of the Crimean earthquakes created by M. V. Smirnov in 1933 is not reconsidered till our days and is used in the historic and archaeological literature without criticism. During archeological excavations of 50-70th years of the XX-th century researchers aspired to find proofs of the earthquakes mentioned in this catalogue even if they were not in reality. It has led to the strengthening of the developed myths and promoted the noncritical approach in search of archaeological monuments destruction reasons. For example, traces of archaeological monuments of Kerch peninsula destruction in I century BC archeologists continue to treat as evidence of the devastating earthquake of 63 year BC in the Crimea. However, as has shown the source study analysis of Italian researcher G. Traina, this earthquake could occur not in Crimea, but in Syria, and therefore it had no destructive consequences on Kerch peninsula. The same concerns to D. L. Talis "detection of destructive traces" of the Crimean earthquake in XIV century, which was not in reality. Nevertheless, the actual material which has been saved up by historians, archeologists and seismologists, has allowed to rethink seismic history of the Crimean peninsula on a new methodological basis on a boundary of the XX-XXI centuries. The new stage in studying of ancient and medieval earthquakes on the Crimean peninsula has begun in 80th years of the XX century. Interest to this problem has grown in connection with struggle for closing of the Crimean atomic power station in which seismic history arguments were actively used.
Добавил в систему: Хапаев Вадим Вадимович

	ИСТИНА	Войти в систему Регистрация
	ИСТИНА ИНХС РАН
	Главная Поиск Статистика О проекте Помощь

ИСТИНА

ИСТИНА ИНХС РАН

Историография XIX-XX вв. об истории крымских землетрясений античного и средневекового периодовстатья

Прикрепленные файлы