|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
ИСТИНА ИНХС РАН |
||
Metal Ecotoxicity Studies with Artificially Contaminated versus Anthropogenically Contaminated Soils: Literature Review, Methodological Pitfalls and Research Prioritiesстатья
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 4 марта 2022 г.
- Авторы: Santa-Cruz J., Vasenev I.I., Gaete H., Peñaloza P., Krutyakov Yu A., Neaman A.
- Журнал: Russian Journal of Ecology
- Том: 52
- Номер: 6
- Год издания: 2021
- Издательство: Russian Academy of Sciences
- Местоположение издательства: Russian Federation
- Первая страница: 478
- Последняя страница: 484
- DOI: 10.1134/S1067413621060126
- Аннотация: Most ecotoxicological studies on the toxicity of metals in soil are conducted using artificially contaminated soils, i.e., originally uncontaminated soils to which increasing amounts of metals are added in theform of soluble salts in a laboratory setting. This approach has been rightly criticized because of the difficultyof extrapolating the results to real field situations. In our literature review, all studies without exceptiondemonstrated a higher toxicity of metals in artificially contaminated soils than in anthropogenically contaminated soils exposed to pollution a few decades ago. Therefore, the traditional approach to the analysis ofmetal toxicity in soils, which is based on metal enrichment, has become outdated; new studies with such soilscannot provide any original insights at this time. We encourage researchers of metal pollution from anthropogenic emissions to analyze dose-effect relationships using native field-collected soils, rather than adoptingthe standard approach, which is based on artificially contaminated soils.Keywords: artificially polluted soil, metal spiking, metal-spiked soil, field-contaminated soil, ecotoxicitythresholds
- Добавил в систему: Крутяков Юрий Андреевич