[Dependence of neuropeptide physiological effects on a route of administration]статья
Информация о цитировании статьи получена из
Scopus
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 28 мая 2015 г.
Аннотация:Following intranasal administration, the peptides’ effects could remain either the same as following an invasive administration (ACTH4-10) which is important for clinical application, or enhanced and prolonged (demorphin and argynilvasopressin analogue), or modified (beta-casomorphin-7). Techniques of improvement of the peptides’ regulatory efficacy through protection against the protease action, are discussed. Peptide protection by introducing D-aminoacid’s isomers into its molecule or addition of proline-rich sequences were compared. The latter technique seems to be more effective.